Tuesday was an interesting day for me at work. What follows is a bit of a rant, a lot of me on a soapbox. Ignore this post if you are looking for tales of fun and travelling.
In order to control how many hours I work in a week, I usually set myself a goal for what time I will leave the office. Tuesday I had a team meeting at 6pm, so I figured I would wrap up work for the day and then head off when the meeting was done. Sorted.
However 6pm rolled around, then 6:30pm and the team still hadn't made a move. Was my calendar playing tricks on me? No. People had 'stuff' to get done, so the meeting was delayed. Not until the next day, but until later that evening. OK, roll with the punches, I'll go back and do more work. The meeting finally started at 7:45pm. Pretty late, everyone agreed, so we'd try to keep it short.
We got through most of the agenda items in about 45 minutes, and were wrapping up the last item when we were joined by some other managers who work with our team. They wanted to review all the items on the agenda to make sure we had understood them. If this had taken 5 minutes I could understand, but this 'review' was still going on 45 minutes later - this has my watch showing 9:15pm. By now, my stomach and my attention span are being severely challenged. In a logical point in the meeting, I suggested that it was late and we could stop re-visiting the items on the agenda that we had already covered. This was met with some laughter, but eventually people started leaving.
(I then went onto dinner at an entertaining market-style European restaurant down the road from home and paid $10 for a glass of Oyster Bay Sav Blanc - crazy, but I needed that drink)
At dinner that night I was congratulated for my initiative to end this meeting. Apparently several other people in the team were also thinking it was crazy to drag a meeting out when it is past 9pm and it is not urgent (we're talking a team catch-up here, nothing time critical). So much of the dinner conversation revolved around my amazement at this series of events and bewilderment on the following concept:
Why do the perfectly intelligent, outgoing people I work with do not feel empowered to put limits on the amount of time their jobs take from them?A few qualifications here:
- Too much and ineffective overtime are a problem with my company in Australia, but the problem is magnified here.
- I did expect hours to be longer here, both due to cultural differences in what is expected as normal and the complexity of the project.
- What I am trying to discover is what is causing people to be at work when they are not being effective? or what is stopping them from really trying to control their work hours?
The group (all Malaysians, Hong Kong-ians and then me) had a few theories develop over dinner last night:
- Asian culture pushes working hard while young to enjoy the spoils when older
- The lack of social security in some Asian cultures means that people have a greater motivation to work hard
- The class limitations of Asian societies gives people more motivation
- Australians value their quality of life more than Asians
One of my personal theories since mulling over this last night:
- The phoney self-esteem culture supported by the US and Australian education systems creates individuals who have an inflated sense of their own worth. This means that when competing in a work environment, they are more secure in their abilities. So when promotion time comes, they believe their brilliance will be evaluated, rather than their not working overtime.
I understand that culture is influenced by many factors, but I am trying to discover the drivers behind this particularly ineffective overtime my colleagues are doing. I think it is likely to be influenced by a combination of motivational factors and differences in personal assertiveness, but I would really like to hear what other people think. So post a comment. Go on.
Gosh I feel better for sharing that rant. Is my future as a social commentator?